The So-Called Fall of Blaxploitation

Guerrero, Ed.  2009. The So-Called Fall of Blaxploitation.  The Velvet Light Trap (University of Texas Press).  64: 90-91.

Ed Guerrero, a noted film scholar and historian, documents the fall in popularity (and financing) of blaxploitation films as part of The Velvet Light Trap’s series on “Perspectives on Failure”. Guerrero attributes the decline of blaxploitation to several factors: disinterest in funding by major studios who are mainly interested in larger, quick profits,  formulaic plots , resistance from  black activist organizations, and finally, Hollywood studios use of blaxploitation to save the film industry from bankruptcy in order to finance larger blockbusters (such as The Godfather). In essence, black actors, directors and writers were used and tossed aside due to profit and lack of interest. Furthermore, audiences for “mainstream” films became overwhelming black; therefore, studios felt that there was no need for films with black interests in mind (91).

In agreeing with Guerrero, I also feel that although blaxploitation is “dead” in a sense of financing from studios and also being somewhat culturally irrelevant as a genre, the genre does deserve critical examination as an important genre of film. In essence, the genre is responsible for many of the motifs we see in hip-hop music, gangster films, and were influential to other African-American film makers (such as Robert Townsend and Keenan Ivory Wayans-both who did spoofs of blaxploitation films).  I am also interested in what the article does not address: How did the fall of blaxploitation affect working actors, particularly the African-American women who had difficulty finding parts in “mainstream” films but found much success via the genre? What has been the impact of blaxploitation on the perceptions of African-American female audiences who were witness a virtual “white washing” of films for years after blaxploitation ended?

The Returns of “Cleopatra Jones"

Brody, Jennifer DeVere. 1999 The Returns of “Cleopatra Jones".  Signs:  Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25 (1): 91-121

Brody takes a queer and feminist theory approach in her assessment of the blaxploitation films Cleopatra Jones and Cleopatra Jones and the Casino of Gold starring Tamara Dobson.  In her critical analysis, Brody tries to explain the appeal of Dobson’s iconic role to hip-hop (“Generation X”) women as a model of feminism as well as analyzes the film Cleopatra Jones and the Casino of Gold in terms of queer  properties. Brody compares the character of Cleopatra Jones (played by the 6’2” Dobson) through a queer lens in stark contrast to other female driven Blaxploitation films such as Coffy and Friday Foster (both starring Pam Grier). These films, all produced by white studios with white directors, were exploitive but showed women who were independent, courageous, and strong (95). But unlike her counterparts, Dobson’s portrayal of Cleopatra Jones is distinctly working within the male action hero formula. From assessment of the dialogue to the costuming, Brody recontextualizes Cleopatra Jones and Tamara Dobson’s portrayal working in several parameters: female, masculine, queer, and finally black (with a theoretical assesment via both queer and black feminist lenses)

This article, I found, was most helpful as the basis of my research project. First, it was only one of a few articles that explicitly spoke about a blaxploitation film with a female lead (and it is the film I plan on showing for my qualitative survey assessment/film viewing).  It was not merely the queer lens that Brody is operating from, but her thorough assessment of Cleopatra Jones (Tamara Dobson) as a woman who was different from other  female leads of the blaxploitation era, who is distinctly masculine and feminine, gendered yet not conforming to gender roles. The ideas of spectatorship are distinctly important to my research project. How do outsiders view issues of race and gender? How do insiders (those of the targeted audience of black women) view race and gender? For my project, I plan on working within the parameter of “insider” feedback and spectatorship. Although I do not plan to use the “queer” lens as Brody has, I found her specific narrowing of an advocacy worldview helpful in trying to identify the scope of my own research.

The Ruse of Engagement: Black Masculinity and the Cinema of Policing

Sexton, Jared. 2009. The Ruse of Engagement: Black Masculinity and the Cinema of Policing. American Quarterly. 61 (1): 39-63

Sexton’s article addresses the intersection of black masculinity within films that deal with elements of “policing” and crime in the film industry. He uses director Antoine Fuqua’s Training Day starring Denzel Washington as a case study (although I argue that this is an accurate description of his analyses and methodology) in the discussion of perceptions of black “maleness” within the realms of cinema. In his assessment, Sexton analyzes past films with strong male leads, especially those starring Sidney Poitier made during the height of blaxploitation film making. Specifically, Sexton analyzes films in which black men are in positions of authority (i.e. police, detectives, investigators, etc) and how this was in stark contrast of society’s view of African-American men as subservient, threatening, unauthorized and unarmed (43). Comparatively, Sexton aligns the film making of Fuqua to those early blaxploitation film makers and discusses several ways in which modern films (particularly those with elements of policing/crime./authority) address similar issues of race, gender and sexuality.

I was particularly interested in several issues this article raises with respect to my own research interest.  The article raises issues of gender and sexuality with regard to African-American men in roles of “policing” yet there is no discussion of African-American women in those same roles. A good strategy in talking about  black masculinity in film is to juxtapose it against the display of “masculinity” in female roles of authority and policing.  There is only a cursory (albeit obligatory) mention of African-American women actors, specifically Halle Berry, and the message her role in Monster’s Ball may have sent with regards to gender and sexuality. The article is good in its assessment of masculinity in black cinema but fails in comparatively analyzing both male and female roles. It would have made the argument of black masculinity being subverted a lot stronger if  the subject was compared with similar female roles.

Women of Blaxploitation: How the Black Action Film Heroine Changed American Popular Culture

Sims, Yvonne D.  2006.  Women of Blaxploitation: How the Black Action Film Heroine Changed American Popular Culture.  Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company

Although written a few years before Stephane Dunn’s book, Yvonne Sims also tackles the subject of black women in blaxploitaiton film from a feminist film theory lens. However, she also gives critical analysis on their impact on popular American culture as a whole and not relegating it to simply the African-American experience. Her argument is that by reshaping notions of African-American femininity and gender blaxploitation films allowed for all women to be seen in less marginalized ways in mainstream action films. There is a comprehensive history of early race films and their use of stereotypical tropes such as Aunt Jemima, Mammy and other domesticated roles. She also employs the sociological and cultural lenses of Patricia Hills Collins, Bell Hooks, and other noteworthy African-American feminist critics as the basis for her analysis of women in blaxploitation.

Other than the introduction, Sims’s book is less narrative and is a strictly critical, qualitative analysis of blaxploitaiton films. Sims does a thorough job of analyzing roles played by Pam Grier and Tamara Dobson as well as their high sexualized, yet power-centered roles’ impact on mainstream action heroines (such as Sigourney Weaver in Alien). The chapter on Pam Grier as the “queen of blaxploitation” (71) is particularly interesting and critical of her oversexualized portrayals of African-American women, yet Sims praises her as a trailblazer in being the most bankable African-American actress of the 1970s and as an unconventional, empowering super-heroine.   Tamara Dobson is analyzed as the antithesis of many of Grier’s characters, not using blatant, irrelevant nudity and sexual overtones to sell the image of strength, femininity, empowerment, and social consciousness (94). The only weakness of the book is that there isn’t a clear correlation between the end of blaxploitation films and the rise of mainstream films (perhaps other than lack of interest and white directors employing blaxploitaiton themes to more mainstream films with mainstream actresses). Again, much of that is inferred from the text and not explicit.

Reflections on Blaxploitation: Actors and Directors Speak

Walker, David. Andrew Rausch, and Chris Watson. 2009. Reflections on Blaxploitation: Actors and Directors Speak.  Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

Walker, Raucsh, and Watson use interviews as the basis for their book exploring the intersecting lives of the actors, directors, and producers involved in making films during the Blaxploitation era.  They interviewed twenty individuals for their book project, some of whom are lesser known actors and directors. Initially, the authors’ debate on which was the start of the blaxploitation film era. Was the beginning of the movement Melvin Van Peeble’s groundbreaking, independent film Sweet SweetBack’s Baadassss Song or was it the MGM, larger-budget backed Shaft staring Richard Roundtree? Despite the debate, these two works lay the groundwork for all blaxploitaiton films to follow during the over a decade long period of the 1970s and early 1980’s.

There are insightful and well organized interviews given in the book.  Not only are there interviews from white directors and producers (such as Ralph Bakhski and Steven Carver), but the book also includes the stars of the film (such notable actors include as Antonio Fargas, Fred Williamson, and Ron O’Neal.) The interviews make sure to talk in depth about the socio-political climate in which the films were being made, any conflicts the actors or directors may have felt with the roles they play or thee films they produced. The book also includes a comprehensive index of almost every single Blaxploitation film that was every produced which is something I am sure most avid film enthusiasts such as myself can use as a valuable resource.

However, where the book lacks tremendously is included the perspectives of African American women. There is only one interview with an African-American Woman, Gloria Hendry, a former model who was the first black “Bond Girl” and co-stared in several notable blaxploitaiton films (Black Caesar, Across 110th Street, Black Belt Jones). The chapter that includes Hendry’s interview is short and seems rather incomplete. There is no discussion on the various roles she played or how she felt about those roles, instead, there is much discussion on her acting in a Bond film and making Black Caesar and the difference between the to films budget wise. Furthermore, there was only a small discussion regarding a very infamous “rape” scene between husband and wife in Black Caesar.  Does Hendry feel that the scene was extraneous or unnecessary? Did she feel it was exploited sexually in her roles? They do not address these issues in the interview. She simply states that “that type of scene had never been done before” (98) and feels that blaxploitation has such a negative connotation and instead it was a “Black [film] Renaissance” (100).

These authors would have benefited to interview more notable women of blaxploitation such as Pam Grier, Tamara Dobson, or Vonetta McGee. Nevertheless, this works serves as a basis for discussion of the genre as a whole as well as racial perceptions and stereotypes.